SR45 amplifier

So is the general opinion that the old SR-45 should be shelved in favor of the the upcoming boards?  I happen to have the orginal kit and a couple of PT-2 transformers that I was going to try to make music with soon.  Will there be a significant improvement from the old amp to the new?  Are the newly proposed boards ready for production or behind other more profitable kits (just trying to see how far down the "to-do" list these are for Paul)?
 
Xavier,

Ok, and I'll bring the Hacienda de Chihuahua :-)

Alonzo,  I've thought about this too, but at least for now I'm going to stick with what I have as I believe it will be a fine amp and I'm just not sure I will really need the DC filament supply.  A great amp is still a great amp :-)  Of course this is just my approach and for now, but I'll keep an open mind for the future if it turns out to be a significant enough upgrade.

-- Jim
 
The new design has two main features - DC filament power for lower hum, and a bigger heat sink for better reliability. It may have film caps for reliability as well; that depends on where Doc B wants to position it, which depends on who we expect to be the customers. If the hum is no problem (it seems to run around 1mV with good 45s, which is actually quite low for an SET) then there would not be a great deal of sonic difference.

The other difference is the OT-2/PC-3 output transformer and choke, which is better matched to the 45 than the original Magnequest iron. I'm not saying my design is better than Mike's (!), just that a 4K load gives better damping than a 3K load.

As for timing, we recently had a great brainstorming session to look at new product development for the next year or two. We haven't documented the results or made all the decisions yet, but we do have a general idea of where we want to go. I can't be very specific yet, but now that the BeePre design is pretty much finalized, the DAC is the next priority. My involvement is just the analog tube output and power supply and won't be so all-consuming, so I'll probably work on the SR amp at the same time.
 
Thanks Paul. Sounds great. That time frame will allow me to save some money for my three pairs (did I mention I already have three pairs of TL404s waiting for this to happen?). I like the 4k better than the 3k because it's closer to the 5k of my 404s. I know you like 404s.

Jim: We're ready to have you here. No need to bring the tequila. I have some :)
 
I am keeping my fingers crossed  for the film cap PS. Would it be too much extra to design two different PS boards, one for film (with a choke or two) and a standard CRC supply to cover both bases?  Or possibly making the film supply schematic an option and we could point to point a PS for it in a none standard chassis?  The film supply board would find nice cross coverage as an upgrade path for the Paramounts too.

Just brain storming here is all  ;D. It seems in the classic BH spirit people intend to customize the design regardless. Mine will put a pair of Dowdy's to use and an oddball OPT for Stax headphones. Thanks PJ for keeping this project alive!
 
johnsonad said:
Would it be too much extra to design two different PS boards, one for film (with a choke or two) and a standard CRC supply to cover both bases? 

Two power supply boards for an amp that isn't likely to be a big seller is unlikely.  On the other hand, I think Doc, PJ, and I are all desiring to get as many of the electrolytics out as possible. 

-PB
 
We also have some other experiments to do that could set this apart from the original SR-45.  That circuit is quite exceptional as-is, but we have to do our due diligence before release to ensure that we haven't "missed" any opportunities. 
 
PJ, if you could factor in an available 2.5v/4% tolerance/1.5 amps supply for the heaters so that we can safely use EML tubes, I would appreciate it!  ;D
 
I use the sex mq plate chokes with tfa 2004 jr outputs (currently m4/co slice). I cant recommend the current amp enough. I just put in a pair of cobalt grid chokes and im listening to it after and the bass is slamming. I am trying to think if i turned up the sub levels. So yesterday n all day im just amazed at the bass. Im thinking the sub is really sounding great. So 2 days later i noticed i had disconnected the sub from the amps when i worked on them and not reconnected them. Amazing bass now! And i always thought it was amazing bass...
 
johnsonad said:
PJ, if you could factor in an available 2.5v/4% tolerance/1.5 amps supply for the heaters so that we can safely use EML tubes, I would appreciate it!  ;D
2.5v at 1.5A IS the 45 tube spec, so it will certainly handle that ...
 
Terran,

Amazing bass?  How sweet the sound?  Sorry, couldn't help myself.

BTW, are those the Orcas you're talking about?

That would be the second time I've heard about people marvelling at the bass and then realizing they didn't have the subs connected/turned on.

-- Jim
 
Lol nice lyrics!  it was actually the Abbys. Can't afford the orca subs yet. I have been ok with the abbys always wanting a bit more but this mod has transformed the speaker. The orcas are on my desk at work with my pdg and doing very well...
 
So Clark says you two (PJ, PB) got a chance to listen to his new Feastrex cab design  ;D

I'm now in for two pair, one for headphone use and the other to drive this upcoming speaker. 
 
Back
Top