Noise with Computers, USB DACs, and Powerline Ethernet Kits

Implemented this on my Speedballed Crack, which had been exhibiting clicking due to the mesh extender I installed.  The fix worked like a charm.  Thanks, Paul!

Joe.
 
This is the best $2 you can spend on the Crack. Perhaps it would be worth including these diodes with the kit and adding the mod into the manual.
 
Toad_of_Toad_Hall said:
This is the best $2 you can spend on the Crack. Perhaps it would be worth including these diodes with the kit and adding the mod into the manual.

I concur  8)
 
I sure do like having the safety ground connected with a solid piece of wire when a component is being powered on for the first time!
 
Those are going to have leads that are quite fat, and it wouldn't surprise me if you couldn't get one properly attached to the #8 solder lug. 
 
I asked because I used those years ago when I built my Crack amp. Aside from the fat leads are their electrical parameters suited to the task?
 
grufti said:
I asked because I used those years ago when I built my Crack amp. Aside from the fat leads are their electrical parameters suited to the task?
Yes, electrically they would be fine for isolation.  Hopefully you didn't use them in place of the UF4007s in the power supply though!
 
No, using them in the power supply would not have been good, not for those diodes and not for the rest of the amp.
 
@PB - I recognize that this mod was only intended to deal with the bigger (noisier) problem of junk on the power lines (for those that have this problem) and not meant to be a fix-all for all types of noise.  But I'm wondering whether this would prevent rfi/emi induced currents picked up by shielding from draining to earth ground?


I was thinking a tiny cap in parallel might provide a workaround a la Broskie and others for high frequency noise, but this wouldn't provide a path for lower frequency noise to drain (e.g., currents induced by a PT or power supply chokes).


Any thoughts?


I like the idea of the protection this simple mod provides. But I don't have discernible noise on my mains - although I do believe my sound take a sight hit when my son is watching tv.  At the same time, I don't want to do anything that compromises all the other "protection" I've built in with extra shielding and drains to ground.


many thanks, Derek
 
Thanks PB. My concern, perhaps (likely) based on misunderstanding, is that this would work well for higher frequency noise -- e.g, 10kHz+ -- but less well for 60/120Hz transformer noise caught by shielding to which a 0.1uF cap would present an effective resistance in the 1000's of Ohms. Does this matter? Or does even such low frequency noise signal, having nowhere else to go, pass directly to earth ground even if provided only a highly resistive (reactive) path to earth ground?


many thanks again, Derek
 
The cap would indeed create a short circuit for high frequency noise from the chassis to the earth ground.  Of course, you don't want to create too good of a short, otherwise the noise we are attempting to block will be passed by the cap, and thus defeat the purpose of the diodes in the first place. 

 
It just occurred to me that there is relatively easy solution for dealing with lots of shielding that needs wiring to ground: install your two-diode mod, but isolate the shielding from chassis ground and wire the shield drains directly to the earth ground lug of the iec inlet. 
 
I've just put in the diode mod and have to say the results were not much short of a revelation. Full volume from the PC and full volume on my MkI crack and it's so silent I think I'm missing something! All of those tiny twitters and buzzes are gone. As a test, I played this at about half volume (HD600) and the silence at the end really enhanced the performance. If Steven Wilson is an unknown name to you please listen. If you're not emotionally drained at the end I'm sort of sorry for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMfGp79fJCQ

Thanks, PB. This should be added to the original build IMO. Just a few pence for such a good result. It's also a good incentive for me to get the Speedball fitted
 
Paul Birkeland said:
I don't see issues doing this with any of our products.  I do also plan to test whether a UF4007 can throw a 20A breaker and survive, as this could also be a suitable part to use.

PB, what's the result of this experiment? As i have some leftover uf4007's from my original Crack build and am planning on reusing them..
 
Back
Top