Quickie preamp

underdawg said:
Batteries from radio shack industrial grade.

Now there is an oxymoron if I have ever seen one!!  ;)

Quickies are fun and perform to an amazing level!  Radio Shack...not so much!  ;D

Cheers,
Geary
 
A bypass capacitor implies that it's bypassing a larger capacitor. 

The capacitor across the cathode resistor is there to act as a short for AC on the filament, removing degenerative feedback that would otherwise be there.

The cathode bypass cap also stabilizes the bias point, though this becomes unnecessary with the PJCSS upgrade IMO.

The size of the cathode bypass cap must be sufficient to offer the same "short" across all audio frequencies and then some.  The 1000uF cap we put in the last Quickie was used because we already had it, the new Quickie uses a 150uF capacitor that we added to our inventory for the BeePre.

-PB
 
The above post is an example of Bottlehead's business acumen.  Stocking a new part costs money.  Until it is necessary you don't do it. 
 
so based on 1000 uf and 150 uf, I assume since I just ordered one its coming with 150 uf caps, so I have some nice mundorf 390 electrolytics that should work ok?
 
underdawg said:
so based on 1000 uf and 150 uf, I assume since I just ordered one its coming with 150 uf caps, so I have some nice mundorf 390 electrolytics that should work ok?
The caps I have are bipolar 390ufd 63 volt, but I am not sure what side is the negative either, I feel stupid being in electronics 25 years and cant tell, tried to google but mundorfs site couldnt tell me.Anyone know if they will work and which side is the negative?
 
Bipolar electrolytics are just that - no polarity, either end can be negative. They do have a reputation of sounding better than polarized electrolytics.
 
A 390uF/63V cap will work well, and the new layout has more room for such adventures.

A bipolar cap doesn't technically have a positive and negative side, just hook them up as you like (but be consistent if there happens to be two different lead lengths).

-PB
 
Thank you paul and cauc I rememebered finally, hence then name , bi, both ways. I did find nos nobles volume controls and they are stereo but each side has 4 posts instead of 3. Any idea's?
 
underdawg said:
Thank you paul and cauc I rememebered finally, hence then name , bi, both ways. I did find nos nobles volume controls and they are stereo but each side has 4 posts instead of 3. Any idea's?

I think a pot with 4 posts may have a tap for loudness, you'll probably have to use some clip leads and test it out and see how it should be hooked up.
 
Caucasian Blackplate said:
underdawg said:
Thank you paul and cauc I rememebered finally, hence then name , bi, both ways. I did find nos nobles volume controls and they are stereo but each side has 4 posts instead of 3. Any idea's?

I think a pot with 4 posts may have a tap for loudness, you'll probably have to use some clip leads and test it out and see how it should be hooked up.
ok when it comes in ill meesage you with measurements
 
Back
Top