Stereomour II 45 Conversion - Anyone Do It Yet?

I am in the process of converting an SII to 45's and have some questions. But first, thanks to everyone here for the invaluable information to help me get started.

Ok, here's my situation. I'm trying to fine tune the filament resistor values, I have the DCF supply installed, and I have standard 45 tubes. Base on data in this thread, I started with a pair of 0.25 ohm resistors, then took measurements: DCF supply voltage = 3.4Vdc,  voltage across each 0.25 ohm resistor = 0.375V,  voltage across filament = 2.66V,  current through filament = 1.5A. This data was recorded after voltages stabilized.

So the filament current is at spec, but the voltage is 6.4% too high. To reduce the filament voltage, I can play around with increasing the resistor values, but if I did that, the current would go down (right?). So is there an achievable solution where the current is 1.5A and the filament voltage is 2.5V? Is hitting one target more important than the other? Any suggestions on what resistor value(s) to try next based on this data point?

Just to see if the filament is "behaving", I gave it 2.5Vdc with a power supply and it consumed 1.5A, so it seems ok.


 
The filament is not purely resistive, so reducing the voltage won't necessarily reduce the current. 

You need to drop an extra 0.16V at 1.5A, which calls for 0.11 ohms of extra resistance, which would mean 0.3 ohm resistors.


If you want a different way to achieve the same goal, you could draw another 0.3A through the filament supply, which you could do with an 8.2 ohm resistor across the filament (pins 1 and 4 on the socket).  It would need to be a 3W resistor.  This is totally OK since everything is rated for 2A3 use.


You don't have to be dead nuts on; the pickiest tube manufacturers would want 2.4-2.6V.

-PB
 
Paul Birkeland said:
The filament is not purely resistive, so reducing the voltage won't necessarily reduce the current. 

@PB - can you say a bit more about this? Since Raymond has the DC filament supply, that knocks out anything frequency dependent - so no impedance, right? So what would allow the filament to present a variable effective resistance?

cheers and thanks, Derek
 
Resistance is a strong function of temperature. When the temperature goes up, so does the resistance - so the current does not increase nearly as rapidly as the voltage alone would suggest.
 
Many thanks PJ. That makes sense. Guessing that explains why superconductors are super-cooled.
 
Holy smokes this topic is way beyond my understanding but I will chime in regarding Lundahl opt's.
In the past 20 years I have used 3 sets of Lundahl 1664 opt's.
I had previously used Hammond 1600 series for hifi  and the 125 series lower end trans for single ended guitar amps and Edcore.
In my opinion the Lundahl opt's have been Fantastic!!!
They are Pretty expensive, Ugly as sin, but i have had nothing but excellent results using them.
The 1664 is a 3k primary but I'm sure what ever you need for a primary impedance if Lundahl makes it I feel you will be happy.
Give them a try, they offer different current versions that may match your requirements.
Just my unsolicited 2 cents worth.
Happy Holidays all
Peace, Love and Happiness
Lee
 
Raymond P. said:
Quick update: 0.3 ohms filament resistors work very well. The voltage and current are comfortably within 5% of spec.

I just converted my Stereomour II to 45 tubes.  Love the sound of the 45 tube.  I too used 0.3R resistors and got voltages of around 2.45V with EML 45 mesh plate tubes.  I have the shunt regulator, DC Filament, and morequiet upgrades installed.  Not that difficult to do, but had to work in some fairly cramped areas with everything already installed
 
For those interested in going 45 and contemplating on the DC supply.

In my setup the SII is quiet on the speakers (102db/w) without any DC supply and EML 45 globe mesh tubes.
EML's are definitely more-quiet than old stock 45's in my collection on AC heaters.
 
Back
Top