Soft start voltage descepancy

The C4S is working correctly. (details below.)

The 431 on the A side is NOT working correctly. If you are getting 2.1v at kreg(A) then the 431 is saturated, which cannot happen if it is working and connected correctly. Normally it would be around 4.0 volts, but this value depends on the particular tube and is not precise. The experiment with the 1K resistor confirms that the tube works, it is just not getting the right bias from the (A side) 431.

Rather than speculate on what might be wrong, or get into too many detailed measurements at the 431 pines and associated resistors, I'd suggest that a new 431 be installed. Make sure the right pins go to the right holes, and that the board is clean so there's no chance of leakage currents through fingerprints or flux residue (a long shot but easy to eliminate!).

Current numbers:

The R1 value of 215 ohms gives 4.0mA, not 4.3mA as I wrote on the schematic. I apologize to everyone for failing to make those consistent. The original intent was to get 4.3mA which would have been a 200 ohm resistor, but I do not think the difference is of any significance.

The 300K resistor which parallels the tube (off the board) takes 0.6mA , leaving 3.4mA for the tube, which is what was measured. So the (B side) C4S feeding the driver plate is operating correctly.
 
Paul Joppa said:
The 300K resistor which parallels the tube (off the board) takes 0.6mA , leaving 3.4mA for the tube, which is what was measured. So the (B side) C4S feeding the driver plate is operating correctly.

Ah, snap, I was totally scratching my head about what was going on, and I forgot about that 300K resistor!
 
Caucasian Blackplate said:
Paul Joppa said:
The 300K resistor which parallels the tube (off the board) takes 0.6mA , leaving 3.4mA for the tube, which is what was measured. So the (B side) C4S feeding the driver plate is operating correctly.

Ah, snap, I was totally scratching my head about what was going on, and I forgot about that 300K resistor!
Yeah, I spent the better part of an hour rummaging in my design and test notes and re-calculating the parts values and currents before it dawned on me. I even wrote a whole post on the non-existent problem, fortunately didn't press the send button.
 
We are so fortunate to have you two! Thank you for taking so much of your time to solve just one of your many customer questions! 
 
I'm happy to report that the amp is up and running to specs with the new LM 431. I'll make a new post soon with more details. For now I'm listening to a surprisingly good sound with zero burn in :) thank you again PB and PJ!
 
Back
Top