Paul Joppa said:People - the Quickie deliberately follows in the footsteps of the original Foreplay, in being as much for fun and playing with as it is for listening to - it's just a fortunate side benefit that it actually sounds good. Rock on!
aragorn723 said:How do you like the teflon? The PIOs are really nice, but I wonder what the teflon would do to the sound (PIO seemed to take some of the bass out, which the black gates brought back, but not completely).
Just a question: the resistance across the output rca of the quickie (if I remember correctly) is 220kohm, so with a 0.022uf cap the cutoff frequency of the rc filter would be 33hz. It seems, by my calculation, that the teflon bypass cap could pass also some bass frequencies, or did I completely miss the point?mcandmar said:Going to say no. The small capacity .022uf will only pass high frequencies and do little to nothing for the low end.
That is certainly worth considering. It isn't uncommon to see an amp with a 10K input impedance.Bonzo said:I haven't considered amp's input impedance
Caucasian Blackplate said:That is certainly worth considering. It isn't uncommon to see an amp with a 10K input impedance.
Bonzo said:Just a question: the resistance across the output rca of the quickie (if I remember correctly) is 220kohm, so with a 0.022uf cap the cutoff frequency of the rc filter would be 33hz. It seems, by my calculation, that the teflon bypass cap could pass also some bass frequencies, or did I completely miss the point?...
Now I lost the track! :-[Paul Joppa said:That is technically true, assuming a similarly high input impedance for the following amplifier. However, the impedance to ground of the "hot" lead is very high, making it sensitive to electric and electromagnetic fields - also known as hum and noise.
Caucasian Blackplate said:That is certainly worth considering. It isn't uncommon to see an amp with a 10K input impedance.
Hah - I'm sorry for the unclear post, so we're even :^)Bonzo said:Now I lost the track! :-[
Paul, do you mean the design of the quickie is likely to be sensitive to hum, period, or that is better to use a low impedance amp with it to reduce hum (and so is better to use bigger teflon caps to hear their contribution even to bass frequencies)?
Sorry for the dumb question!![]()
aragorn723 said:Interestingly, I have an amp with 10k input impedance.. So does that mean the rolloff frequency would be lower with that? The bass isn't bad, I just wish there was a little more sometimes.. Maybe a subwoofer would fix this (got a few laying around).
Dave
Paul Joppa said:Hah - I'm sorry for the unclear post, so we're even :^)
For the best noise sensitivity, the coupling cap impedance should be less than the source impedance of the preamp (about 2K ohms for the stock Quickie, 4K with the PJCCS), at the lowest frequency of interest for noises. That places the "hot" interconnect line at the lowest possible impedance to ground, enabling it to minimize electric field (capacitive) coupling.
My usual rule is to make the cap impedance less than the source resistance at 120Hz. I also check that the response corner for the lowest rated load impedance is 5Hz or lower. These are two different and independent criteria, and are occasionally over-ridden by listening tests - I love science but it is not everything.
Caucasian Blackplate said:If you have a tiny cap at the output of the Quickie and a 10K input impedance on your power amp, you'll get bass rolloff.
The output impedance of the Quickie is also a tad high for a 10K load, but this is more about distortion rather than frequency response.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.