InfernoSTi said:I used the 2.7uF and 0.1uF caps, respectively. They are significantly larger than the Auricaps but locating them was easy with the 0.1uF going below and in front and the 2.7uF going above and centered (a "hanging" cap location). . .
John
ebag4 said:Hi John,
I am glad to hear you are enjoying the Mundorfs. I have to tell you that those cute little caps are not big, these are big: . . .
And I thought you were from Texas?? ;-D
Best,
Ed
Grainger49 said:John, Ed! There is no use in arguing whose is/are bigger!
Grainger49 said:Still, I like pictures of big caps.
jrebman said:I'm sure you're going to be floored at the sound with the upgraded tweeters and crossovers.
The SIOs will be even better at 50 hours and should be all the way there by 200, though it seems at 100 you'll be most of the way there.
Looking forward to the report on the whole thing, especially after the tweeter and crossover upgrades.
jrebman said:I'm considering some 10" augies to put in an OB H-frame sub, though the temptation to go servo OB is pretty strong too. These would be to augment my lowthers and/or zigmahornets and I want to stick with natural fiber cones.
Grainger49 said:InfernoSTi said:I used the 2.7uF and 0.1uF caps, respectively. They are significantly larger than the Auricaps but locating them was easy with the 0.1uF going below and in front and the 2.7uF going above and centered (a "hanging" cap location). . .
Johnebag4 said:Hi John,
I am glad to hear you are enjoying the Mundorfs. I have to tell you that those cute little caps are not big, these are big: . . .
And I thought you were from Texas?? ;-D
Best,
Ed
John, Ed! There is no use in arguing whose is/are bigger!
Sorry, I couldn't pass this up.
The higher the voltage rating and the larger the capacitance value the larger any design gets. I'm impressed that the 1200V Mundorfs are that small.
Still, I like pictures of big caps. Now it is your turn.
jrebman said:Took a quick look at that thread and see that it is Randy Rash, who I've corresponded with in the past, especially about his Type 10 amp from Greenvalve.
jrebman said:I still have to figure out which speaker is going to go where in my house before I make any decisions on subs. I generally don't like subs, but OB is another thing altogether. I recently convinced my wife to let me move the office part of my office into another room, which means I can dedicate the existing office to a listening room, however, e ven though the room is 10.5' x 16.5', I really only have a 10.5' square with which to work, so I'm not sure how well an OB will work in that setup. If it does, it will do so just barely and with the listening chair rght up against the back wall.
jrebman said:FYI, the GR-Research SA-1 plate amps also have the OB shelving filter and 20 hz HP filter and are intended for sealed or OB subs.
Danny is also now in production of the first run of his new 8" servo OB driver, alongwith a purpose designed amp from Brian Ding. That may be the only setup that has a prayer of keepin up with the Lowthers (dx-55s with aluminum VCs and high-ferric). I would probably also use a single enclosure with two drivers and place them between the mains, as I'm told this will not kill the soundstage as with other types of subs.
jrebman said:Wonder if anybody has ever built a full 10" trio -- seems like that would be really quick and articulate with decent enough bass for my small room. Oh well, then I'm back to the question of whether the OBs will work in this room at all...![]()
ebag4 said:Very cool to hear John. I will be ordering the Pavane 12AT7 at the end of the week when the folks from Grant Fidelity return from the California show(s). I am anxious to hear what other driver tubes do in the Stereomour, and with it requiring only a single tube it makes it quite cost effective to try a few.
Enjoy!
Ed
jrebman said:John,
I'm sure you're going to be floored at the sound with the upgraded tweeters and crossovers.
I'm considering some 10" augies to put in an OB H-frame sub, though the temptation to go servo OB is pretty strong too. These would be to augment my lowthers and/or zigmahornets and I want to stick with natural fiber cones.
TThe SIOs will be even better at 50 hours and should be all the way there by 200, though it seems at 100 you'll be most of the way there.
Looking forward to the report on the whole thing, especially after the tweeter and crossover upgrades.
-- Jim
InfernoSTi said:I guess Ed knows what he is talking about after all....
ebag4 said:Hi John,
Initially I didn't think I heard much of a trade off when I removed my 100K Caddocks and replaced them with the Alps pot. After more listening I determined that I did loose a bit of clarity. Unfortunately I don't have another volume control right now (I built an LDR but can't get rid of a hum issue so I don't use it). I am considering getting a high quality ladder type volume control and see how that works out.
I thought I might be able to adjust my resistor value and simply use the digital control in MPD for small changes but what I have found is that there is too much variance in the sound levels of of different albums, this means I require some level of adjust-ability in the analog domain so that I can limit the amount of digital adjustment used (less digital adjustment=better sound quality).
I will be interested to read your impressions of the Warpspeed.
Best,
Ed
If Decibel's Exclusive Access Mode is enabled and the DAC supports integer input (footnote 2), Decibel will now send audio to the DAC as integers. Although audio files are stored as integers (whole numbers), a Mac internally converts audio data to 32-bit floating-point data, which allows mathematical processing (such as volume control and equalization). The floating-point data are reconverted to16- or 24-bit integer, as appropriate, before being sent to an audio device. Decibel's Integer Mode sends the unprocessed data straight to the device.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.