Configure Stereomour for headphones?
- Thread starter HF9
- Start date
Physically it's not too challenging, you just add a headphone jack and wire it to the speaker outputs. However, the Stereomour uses AC heaters and at around 1mV of hum it may be too noisy for your taste (it was not intended to be used as a headphone amp and I have not tried it). PJs trick of adding 120 ohm resistors in series with the jack as used in the SEX amp might help reduce the hum in the Stereomour if it is not too intrusive to begin with, but you are going to have to try it with your headphones to be sure.
The Crack, SEX amp and Paramount are all quiet enough to use with headphones as-is. I use Paramounts with AKG K1000s and the DC heated filaments in those amps are very quiet.
The Crack, SEX amp and Paramount are all quiet enough to use with headphones as-is. I use Paramounts with AKG K1000s and the DC heated filaments in those amps are very quiet.
balancedtriode
New member
im very interested in being the test subject for this can some 1 please give me step by step instructions on how to do this?
thanks
thanks
I'm a pretty firm believer in the "give a man a fish" notion. ( you know - "Give a man a fish and you feed him for one day. Teach a man to fish and he'll be out on the boat every weekend getting trashed on Bud.")
So I'll give you the general stuff you need to know and I think you can probably take it from there.
A headphone jack is a stereo 1/4" phone jack. That has a tip, a ring, and a sleeve contact that correspond to the contacts on the TRS plug that goes into it, hence the common terminology of TRS. You can google TRS plug and see a zillion pics of this. The terminals will probably be labeled on the headphone jack you choose, but even if not you can figure the connections out - tip is at the tip, the ring is the middle contact and the sleeve is the one closest to the mounting nut. You connect the black (-) speaker binding posts from both channels to the sleeve terminal, aka "Common". The tip terminal connects to the left channel red (+) speaker binding post. The ring terminal connects to the right channel red (+) speaker binding post. If you want to try the 120 ohm resistors, they simply go one each between the left red post and the T terminal and the right red post and the R terminal.
You can either drill a hole, mount a chassis mount headphone jack and wire it to the binding posts under the chassis, or you could use an inline stereo headphone jack and connect wires to it that could connect to the binding posts like a regular speaker cable. If you do that it might be worth putting banana plugs on the ends of the wires for an easy connect and disconnect.
So I'll give you the general stuff you need to know and I think you can probably take it from there.
A headphone jack is a stereo 1/4" phone jack. That has a tip, a ring, and a sleeve contact that correspond to the contacts on the TRS plug that goes into it, hence the common terminology of TRS. You can google TRS plug and see a zillion pics of this. The terminals will probably be labeled on the headphone jack you choose, but even if not you can figure the connections out - tip is at the tip, the ring is the middle contact and the sleeve is the one closest to the mounting nut. You connect the black (-) speaker binding posts from both channels to the sleeve terminal, aka "Common". The tip terminal connects to the left channel red (+) speaker binding post. The ring terminal connects to the right channel red (+) speaker binding post. If you want to try the 120 ohm resistors, they simply go one each between the left red post and the T terminal and the right red post and the R terminal.
You can either drill a hole, mount a chassis mount headphone jack and wire it to the binding posts under the chassis, or you could use an inline stereo headphone jack and connect wires to it that could connect to the binding posts like a regular speaker cable. If you do that it might be worth putting banana plugs on the ends of the wires for an easy connect and disconnect.
Doc, is 1mV hum even that intrusive? I thought most amps available by other manufacturers were nowhere near that quiet. A hybrid tube/SS amp I had once featured a headphone jack and audible hum, which I would have guessed was well above a millivolt; more like 20mV! When the music played, you couldn't hear the hum, however.
The S.E.X. amp is quoted as having an 83dB SNR. What does that end up being in terms of mV of hum in the signal? (I can attest to the absolutely black background of the S.E.X. amp over cans and speakers). Perhaps the OP would be best looking at the S.E.X. amp first.
The S.E.X. amp is quoted as having an 83dB SNR. What does that end up being in terms of mV of hum in the signal? (I can attest to the absolutely black background of the S.E.X. amp over cans and speakers). Perhaps the OP would be best looking at the S.E.X. amp first.
Paul Joppa
Moderator
SEX runs around 0.3mV hum. You can get down to 2mV with a 2A3 on AC heaters usually, and a good old-stock 45 might get as low as 1mV.
lolitsluis
New member
I was wondering if there had been any progress on adding a headphone jack to the stereomour
I have several pairs of 45's that were slated for a Tubelab SE. I was going to build a headphone amp with it, but now I'm considering this amp instead.
This brings me to my question. For that build I ordered custom OPT's with Headphone impeadences from Electra-Print. They're 5K Primary @ 65ma 3W Secondaries are 32, 120, 300, 400
would those OPT's work with the Stereomour for headphone use?
This brings me to my question. For that build I ordered custom OPT's with Headphone impeadences from Electra-Print. They're 5K Primary @ 65ma 3W Secondaries are 32, 120, 300, 400
would those OPT's work with the Stereomour for headphone use?
As you increase the impedance of the output taps the step down ratio of the transformer decreases, thus increasing the noise level in the headphone. This amp has AC heaters and is not intended as a headphone amp as it may not have a satisfactory noise floor in that application. Our transformers are designed for parallel feed and I don't know if the Electraprint model that you are speaking of is. I also don't know what size the transformer is so I don't know if it would fit. Jack would probably be the guy to ask if his transformer will work in our stuff.
We are looking into a transformer output headphone amp that would have multiple taps at higher impedances, but I can't say when that product will be ready. It would not be possible to adapt it to 45 tubes.
We are looking into a transformer output headphone amp that would have multiple taps at higher impedances, but I can't say when that product will be ready. It would not be possible to adapt it to 45 tubes.
Paul Joppa
Moderator
FWIW, On the long-term radar I have an idea for a shunt regulated 45 amp with DC heaters, which could make a dandy little headphone amp.
I know this thread is old, but...
Still curious as to whether anybody has been brave enough to try the Stereomour with headphones (esp. those running 45 tubes vs. 2A3's). One thing that's honestly held me back from biting the bullet is that if I replace the SEX amp on my rack with a Stereomour, I lose the ability to listen to LP's with my headphones, or my Squeezebox, etc. My "main rig" definitely needs a headphone capability. Would 1mV of hum through a 5k-8 transformer with a 120 ohm series resistor really be that intrusive?
Still curious as to whether anybody has been brave enough to try the Stereomour with headphones (esp. those running 45 tubes vs. 2A3's). One thing that's honestly held me back from biting the bullet is that if I replace the SEX amp on my rack with a Stereomour, I lose the ability to listen to LP's with my headphones, or my Squeezebox, etc. My "main rig" definitely needs a headphone capability. Would 1mV of hum through a 5k-8 transformer with a 120 ohm series resistor really be that intrusive?
Paul Joppa
Moderator
The reason that the SEX amp has DC on the heaters is that, even with indirectly-heated cathodes, there was too much hum for headphones using AC. Since this was to be our most affordable, entry level amp, we did not want to add the cost of DC heaters, but in the end decided that having the headphone capability was worth the added cost.
This was more than seven years ago, and I don't remember what the measured hum was, but it was pretty low. Just had to be lower for headphones. We did a lot of listening.
This was more than seven years ago, and I don't remember what the measured hum was, but it was pretty low. Just had to be lower for headphones. We did a lot of listening.
The Crack uses AC heaters (albeit with IDHT tubes, just like the SEX). Is the lack of hum in that circuit due to the low output power (30mW?) in comparison to something like the SEX or Stereomour (2W or more)? The Crack is even quieter than my SEX amp over my HD650's.
Still hoping you guys will come out with the "ultimate" integrated amp: something that looks like the SEX amp, but with more inputs, a bit more power, and DHT's instead of dual triodes. If the Stereomour had DC heaters, that would be exactly the ticket, but I understand how that adds to the cost and complexity of the amp, not to mention that it poses additional engineering challenges with the power transformer, etc.
Still hoping you guys will come out with the "ultimate" integrated amp: something that looks like the SEX amp, but with more inputs, a bit more power, and DHT's instead of dual triodes. If the Stereomour had DC heaters, that would be exactly the ticket, but I understand how that adds to the cost and complexity of the amp, not to mention that it poses additional engineering challenges with the power transformer, etc.
Paul Joppa
Moderator
Just in principal, we have done the two integrated amps because it is a bit more economical, especially if you don't use a preamp. But it's less flexible, and sacrifices the sonic advantages of monoblocks to achieve those economic benefits.
The hum from AC heaters in indirectly-heated tubes will vary a lot between individual tubes. And, since it comes partly from leakage currents, it will change as the tube ages. Of course it is also highly dependent on the sensitivity of whatever follows the amp in question. We have a lot of experience with hum from AC-heated 12AU7s, since they were in the original Foreplay - that's nearly 15 years ago, I think. Many owners have been very happy and had no hum problems at all, but a good number did have hum problems, and there were many solutions developed over the years. DC heaters seemed to be the most reliable, which is why that became part of the circuit with the major re-design of version III.
The hum from AC heaters in indirectly-heated tubes will vary a lot between individual tubes. And, since it comes partly from leakage currents, it will change as the tube ages. Of course it is also highly dependent on the sensitivity of whatever follows the amp in question. We have a lot of experience with hum from AC-heated 12AU7s, since they were in the original Foreplay - that's nearly 15 years ago, I think. Many owners have been very happy and had no hum problems at all, but a good number did have hum problems, and there were many solutions developed over the years. DC heaters seemed to be the most reliable, which is why that became part of the circuit with the major re-design of version III.
Paul, what if I tied the output signal from the selector switch decks in the Steremour to the third set of RCA jacks, normally used for input, with a 1k resistor, as you've suggested long ago for adding a sub output to the Foreplay? That way, I'd still have my two inputs (one for a digital source, one for the Seduction), and would gain a "tape out" to go into the Crack, which I could find room for (somehow) on my rack. Since the speaker amp wouldn't be on when I was listening to headphones with the Crack, I would assume this would not cause loading problems, and I wouldn't have to wire a cut switch. Yet, I could still switch between sources on the Stereomour.
Paul Joppa
Moderator
Dr. Toobz, that should work. It would place the 100K controls in the Stereomour in parallel with those in the Crack, for a net 50K, but that's an easy load for Seduction and pretty much anything digital.
Hi guys
I've been looking at the Stereomour for a very long time and the only thing that's kept me from pulling the trigger on it, has been the lack of a headphone output.
I own a pair of Grado SR325is, and using the specs of these I did some calculations.
Before I go on I should warn you, that I have never built anything, nor worked with electronics before, so please just tell me if the following is BS
OK here we go:
The Grados are 98dB sensitive @ 1mW and are 32 ohm impedant.
The SEX amp rated at 0,3mV hum will produce 2,8nW into 32ohm. This should produce roughly 41dB hum in the grados.
The Stereomour amp rated at 1 mV hum will produce 31nW producing roughly 51 dB.
This I guess could be a problem.
I was thinking if this could be solved by dividing the voltage in by using resistors like in this pic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Resistive_divider.png
Using values of R1=6 ohms and R2=2 ohms and letting the headphone sit in parallel with R2, a 32 ohm headphone would recieve only ~1,5% of the power put into the devider.
The impedance seen by the amp is now only ~8 ohms and the hum is therefore larger by a factor of 4 (124nW). However only 1,5% of this will go to the headphone and the overall hum will be ~1,9nW. This is even lower than with the SEX.
The dampening factor should still be ok at a value of appx 2.
The downside is that you lose a lot of power. Max output would be ~50mW.
So what do you think? Could this work or is it just crazy ramblings?
Will 50mW be enough power for my grados?
Will running the amp this hard cause the OT's to saturate and thus make me lack low end?
Thank you guys for a great forum. Though this is my first post ive been reading end enjoying it for at least a year now.
I've been looking at the Stereomour for a very long time and the only thing that's kept me from pulling the trigger on it, has been the lack of a headphone output.
I own a pair of Grado SR325is, and using the specs of these I did some calculations.
Before I go on I should warn you, that I have never built anything, nor worked with electronics before, so please just tell me if the following is BS
OK here we go:
The Grados are 98dB sensitive @ 1mW and are 32 ohm impedant.
The SEX amp rated at 0,3mV hum will produce 2,8nW into 32ohm. This should produce roughly 41dB hum in the grados.
The Stereomour amp rated at 1 mV hum will produce 31nW producing roughly 51 dB.
This I guess could be a problem.
I was thinking if this could be solved by dividing the voltage in by using resistors like in this pic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Resistive_divider.png
Using values of R1=6 ohms and R2=2 ohms and letting the headphone sit in parallel with R2, a 32 ohm headphone would recieve only ~1,5% of the power put into the devider.
The impedance seen by the amp is now only ~8 ohms and the hum is therefore larger by a factor of 4 (124nW). However only 1,5% of this will go to the headphone and the overall hum will be ~1,9nW. This is even lower than with the SEX.
The dampening factor should still be ok at a value of appx 2.
The downside is that you lose a lot of power. Max output would be ~50mW.
So what do you think? Could this work or is it just crazy ramblings?
Will 50mW be enough power for my grados?
Will running the amp this hard cause the OT's to saturate and thus make me lack low end?
Thank you guys for a great forum. Though this is my first post ive been reading end enjoying it for at least a year now.
