Larpy
Member
I ordered one of the restocked Crackatwoa kits and finished the build yesterday. As a repeat Bottlehead offender, I've built my fair share of kits over the years (3 Foreplays, a Moreplay, Eros, Mainline, S3X, and a Kaiju), but I never got around to buying a Crackatwoa kit before it was retired a couple of years ago. It turns out the Mainline was not my cup of tea, and so I'm grateful I got a second chance at the Crackatwoa. My first taste of tube audio was buying one of Pete Millett's Wheatfield HA-2 headphone amps back in 1999, and I've long suspected that BH's Crack (and by extension the Crackatwoa) was influenced by the Wheatfield's OTL topology. I never built a Crack (I heard one and decided I was happy with my Wheatfield), but the Crackatwoa intrigued me as a possible Wheatfield upgrade.
And it (mostly) is. I built my Crackatwoa stock except for a lighted power switch and a Goldpoint attenuator instead of the volume and balance pots (and velcro instead of plastic ties to secure the output caps). To my ears, the Crackatwo finds a near-perfect balance between resolution and tubey sweetness and warmth. It's not as lush as the Crack or the Wheatfield, but it still sounds plenty tubey, and it's noticeably more detailed/resolving than either.
The Wheatfield still has a certain magic, perhaps due to its using a 6SN7 rather than a 12AU7 as the driver tube and running both it and the 6AS7 cathode follower mercilessly (plate voltages are twice as high, and the 6AS7's cathodes measure an astonishing 190 volts each), but I think I prefer the Crackatwoa's overall presentation: a little less lush but more resolution. More relaxed and assured.
And this impression is with the stock electrolytic caps in the Crackatwoa's output. I'll replace them with film caps later this week. I also have a 12AU7>6SN7 adaptor on the way from Garage1217, so I'll try a few 6SN7s in place of the 12AU7.

A few questions:
1) I have 47uF film caps in my parts collection but no 100uFs. If I use only high impedance headphones (Sennheisier 800s), I'm assuming 47uF output caps will go low enough in the bass. Is this assumption correct or do is there more to the 100uF specification than bass extension?
2) If it turns out I prefer the 6SN7 as a driver tube, are there any modifications to the C4S board I should make to optimize it for the 6SN7's parameters? (different resistor values for example?)
In my view, the Crackatwo is an unheralded gem. For whatever reason, it seems it didn't sell well when it was first offered. There are precious few reviews or even mentions of it online. The Crack was such a smash hit that it seems to have hogged all the attention. But the Crackatwoa sounds wonderful. True, it's not cheap (though I spent almost the same amount of money on a new Wheatfield HA-2 back in 1999), but I for one find it more engaging to listen to than either the S3X or the Mainline, let alone the Crack. I'm something of a headphone amp obsessive (I've built 6 or 7 of them), and the Crackatwoa is up there with the best I've heard.
Looks like there's stilla Crackatwoa in stock for anyone who, like me, was on the fence was it was first discontinued.
And it (mostly) is. I built my Crackatwoa stock except for a lighted power switch and a Goldpoint attenuator instead of the volume and balance pots (and velcro instead of plastic ties to secure the output caps). To my ears, the Crackatwo finds a near-perfect balance between resolution and tubey sweetness and warmth. It's not as lush as the Crack or the Wheatfield, but it still sounds plenty tubey, and it's noticeably more detailed/resolving than either.
The Wheatfield still has a certain magic, perhaps due to its using a 6SN7 rather than a 12AU7 as the driver tube and running both it and the 6AS7 cathode follower mercilessly (plate voltages are twice as high, and the 6AS7's cathodes measure an astonishing 190 volts each), but I think I prefer the Crackatwoa's overall presentation: a little less lush but more resolution. More relaxed and assured.
And this impression is with the stock electrolytic caps in the Crackatwoa's output. I'll replace them with film caps later this week. I also have a 12AU7>6SN7 adaptor on the way from Garage1217, so I'll try a few 6SN7s in place of the 12AU7.

A few questions:
1) I have 47uF film caps in my parts collection but no 100uFs. If I use only high impedance headphones (Sennheisier 800s), I'm assuming 47uF output caps will go low enough in the bass. Is this assumption correct or do is there more to the 100uF specification than bass extension?
2) If it turns out I prefer the 6SN7 as a driver tube, are there any modifications to the C4S board I should make to optimize it for the 6SN7's parameters? (different resistor values for example?)
In my view, the Crackatwo is an unheralded gem. For whatever reason, it seems it didn't sell well when it was first offered. There are precious few reviews or even mentions of it online. The Crack was such a smash hit that it seems to have hogged all the attention. But the Crackatwoa sounds wonderful. True, it's not cheap (though I spent almost the same amount of money on a new Wheatfield HA-2 back in 1999), but I for one find it more engaging to listen to than either the S3X or the Mainline, let alone the Crack. I'm something of a headphone amp obsessive (I've built 6 or 7 of them), and the Crackatwoa is up there with the best I've heard.
Looks like there's stilla Crackatwoa in stock for anyone who, like me, was on the fence was it was first discontinued.
