Using R+C instead of LED.

garfo

New member
Good day,

Was wondering if anybody has tried to change the LED with typical R+C and what results has he experienced.

Many thanks,

garfo.
 
You can replace each LED with a resistor, and you will reduce the overall gain of the preamp, but it will otherwise still work.  Adding a large capacitor across the resistor will restore the gain.  (A pair of 470 Ohm resistors are acceptable)

The LED offers the best of both worlds.  It gives us the proper bias voltage that we want, with very low AC impedance (like a capacitor), but it sounds way better than any capacitor we have ever tried. 

-PB
 
Ok, so we shd actually use a lower value than 470R for the cathode resistor. Nevertheless will start with 470R tantalum/1W and 1pct and move from there. What about shunt caps ? Is 150uF ok ?
 
A 1W resistor is physically way too big for the job.  1/100 of a Watt is enough power for the resistor, go small so you can get them to fit!  Additionally, when you put a big cap across them, the cap is providing the low impedance path to signal currents. 

For what it's worth, the LED will sound a lot better than any resistor/cap combination, so I wouldn't spend too much money on parts that you may well end up throwing away.

-PB
 
Good question, but Bottlehead uses it often.  In their upgrades they are replaced with constant current sources.  But your question would be better aimed at the companies who don't use LED biasing.
 
In anycase it appears that given 3.8mA absorbed by the tube, the correct value for R should be 390R.  This will give more or less the 1.5VDC tension. Ie 390x0.0038=1.482V, owise 470R will give 1.78V.

Am I wrong somewhere ?
 
garfo said:
If LED biasing is that performant, why is it so rarely used in SE applications ?
Solid state parts are often "scary" to potential SE customers.  It also costs a lot more than just using a resistor/capacitor combination. 

Other technology in our amps that you won't find in SE amps:

1.  Shunt regulated power supplies.
2.  Parallel feed output topology.
3.  Constant current source loads.
4.  Cree high voltage Schottky diodes

etc. etc.

The biasing diodes give us exactly the bias we want with low dynamic impedance across the audio band (not necessarily the case with a cap).  We could save some money by going with a resistor and capacitor instead, but it just doesn't sound as good.
 
Money not an issue really, a good cap and a resistor can easly cost twice the led. For your guidance, here in Eu, we can easily buy a pair of HLMP6000 for 50c (sensibly less when buyong more than 1 piece). A good capacitor, like Evox Rifa for example, can go upto 10 dollars.
 
garfo said:
Money not an issue really [...] A good capacitor, like Evox Rifa for example, can go up to 10 dollars.
I think money is exactly the issue.  We seem to notice sometimes that folks will throw money into parts for their kits that may actually hurt performance. (I did this a lot when I was first building kits)

I'll just reiterate that in our 20+ years of designing and building many different tube circuits, no resistor/capacitor combination has come close to the venerable HLMP-6000.  (Even Blackgate caps and Tantalum resistors)  You will also notice that in our least expensive tube preamp (the Quickie), we have compromised for costs and used a resistor and capacitor per channel for biasing.

 
It's the best one we have found (it maintains its characteristic voltage at many currents, and it's quiet).

There was a builder some time ago who converted to a 5687 driver tube, and that required a different LED (for a different bias voltage).
 
FWIW, a few months ago a built a pair of Paramour IIs. I was missing the leds an used resistors bypassed with black gate caps. The amps sounded dark. Then Keto loaned me a few hlpm 6000 leds and the amps have been shinning since then.

 
Thats seems to be a very strong statement. Have heard tons of excellent sounding amps with RC on each stage. Certainly the direct coupling of the Crack has a greater influence on the sound that the led biasing. As said beforet, I am only curious to try a good pair of resistore and capacitors and make my own judgment.
 
I have also heard very good amps with rc biasing. I'm not generalizing. I'm in the process of building a two pairs of amps with MQ silver iron taht will have rc biasing on the driver.

Still I couldn't believe the difference when going from rc to leds on the Paramours.

 
IME a bypass cap on a cathode colors the sound. Running without a bypass cap means you will have some degenerative feedback that will lower the gain. Whether or not the circuit is direct coupled is irrelevant to this, that is, to say that direct coupling or whatever has more influence does not change the fact that there are differences between using LED bias and RC bias. I will suggest that using an LED actually makes the direct coupled design easier since it helps to stabilize the 12AU7s plate voltage. I do think that you are making the correct choice of trying it for yourself and decided whether it works for you.  But I'm sorry to inform you that even if you think a resistor and cap sounds better we won't be changing the design ;)
 
That's not my aim. The Crack has nice dynamics and runs with power but has a sort of hardness. Not sure wether this is the result of led biasing or something else. I do appreciate the direct coupling a lot (hv all Spectral gear in the main system) that it gives a lively feel to the music presentation. It is certainly a good project but could go beyond expectations and maybe I am starting from the wrong prospective instead of thinking of a better power supply.
 
Back
Top