My FP3 has 2 output I am planning to use 2 RCA splitter to create 4 output
Output 1will feed a midbass amp (50k input impedence)
Output 2 will feed a tvc volume control and feed the Welbourne starchief 45 ( I dont know the input impedence) which drives the midrange horn and tweeter.
Output 3 feeds a Dahlquist lp 1 best estimate 25k input impedance which feeds a transistor amp bridged 560 watt to the sub
Out 4 reseved for my 2a3 if want to drive just the tweeter in the future.
I am concern with imput inpedance and resultant strain on the preamp.
Audio friends suggest using a pair of 5: 1 wide bandwidth transformer and position its use before the existing RCA out. The explanation is that this way my FP3 preamp will handle the multiple amps better.
If this is a correct approach can you suggest the specification of such a transformer an a good brand candidate.
Appreciate any thoughts.
Present configuration
I am currently running one fp3 rca to midbass amp the other rca to my tvc volume control. It has 2 output female RCAs.
One pair female RCA feeds my 45 amps; the other to the dahlquist then feeding the sub.
I have thus far been unattentive to the impedance mismatch....It sounds ok to me but thought that I would be able to extract more out of the FP3 by improving the impedance matching. In my challeged way of putting it.... .I want to not strain the FP3 and hope to gain more air spatial imaging etc etc...you know the nirvana syndrome
Thanks look forward to your various input on this. ..
Output 1will feed a midbass amp (50k input impedence)
Output 2 will feed a tvc volume control and feed the Welbourne starchief 45 ( I dont know the input impedence) which drives the midrange horn and tweeter.
Output 3 feeds a Dahlquist lp 1 best estimate 25k input impedance which feeds a transistor amp bridged 560 watt to the sub
Out 4 reseved for my 2a3 if want to drive just the tweeter in the future.
I am concern with imput inpedance and resultant strain on the preamp.
Audio friends suggest using a pair of 5: 1 wide bandwidth transformer and position its use before the existing RCA out. The explanation is that this way my FP3 preamp will handle the multiple amps better.
If this is a correct approach can you suggest the specification of such a transformer an a good brand candidate.
Appreciate any thoughts.
Present configuration
I am currently running one fp3 rca to midbass amp the other rca to my tvc volume control. It has 2 output female RCAs.
One pair female RCA feeds my 45 amps; the other to the dahlquist then feeding the sub.
I have thus far been unattentive to the impedance mismatch....It sounds ok to me but thought that I would be able to extract more out of the FP3 by improving the impedance matching. In my challeged way of putting it.... .I want to not strain the FP3 and hope to gain more air spatial imaging etc etc...you know the nirvana syndrome
Thanks look forward to your various input on this. ..